Alcohol and Minorities: An Update

Patterns of alcohol use and its consequences vary widely among minority groups. Although more research is
needed, evidence suggests that prevention and treatment efforts may be more effective when based on an
understanding of the ethnic context of drinking behaviors and their development (1, 2). This
Alcohol Alert
summarizes research on differences in alcohol use and problems, selected determinants of drinking and the
development of targeted prevention and treatment programs with respect to the four main minority groups in
the United States: African Americans, Hispanics, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) and American
Indians/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs). It is important to note that these categories include hundreds of distinct ethnic
or racial populations which differ markedly in cultural characteristics and drinking behavior. Consequently,
research does not support broad generalizations about specific subpopulations, many of which have not been
studied individually (3).
Ethnic Differences in Drinking Patterns

Data from nationwide surveys of adults show that both current
drinking (defined as consumption of 12 or more drinks in the past
year) and heavy drinking
1 are most prevalent among AI/ANs (4) and
Native Hawaiians, (5) and lowest among AAPIs (4). Alcohol use is
increasing significantly among Asian Americans, who constitute one
of the fastest growing U.S. minority populations (6). Among
adolescent minorities studied nationwide, African Americans show
the lowest prevalence of lifetime, annual, monthly, daily and heavy
drinking, as well as the lowest frequency of being drunk (7). Hispanic
adolescents have the highest annual prevalence of heavy drinking,
followed by Whites (7). Among all age and ethnic groups, men are
more likely to drink than are women, and to consume large quantities
in a single sitting (7, 4).
1 Heavy drinking is defined as five drinks on a single day at least once a month for adults (4) and five drinks in
a row at least once during the previous two weeks for adolescents (7).
Ethnicity and Alcohol Problems
Medical Consequences. Research on alcohol's health effects on minority groups has concentrated largely
on cirrhosis, a progressive and often fatal liver disease usually attributable to long-term heavy drinking.
Analysis shows a strong correlation between death rates from liver cirrhosis, regardless of cause, and drinking
levels nationwide (8). Consistent with this association, deaths from chronic liver disease and cirrhosis are about
4 times more prevalent among AI/ANs than among the general U.S. population (3). However, Hispanics are
approximately twice as likely as Whites to die from cirrhosis (8), despite a lower prevalence of drinking and
heavy drinking (9). The reason for this discrepancy is unclear. Evidence exists that Hispanics tend to consume
alcohol in higher quantities per drinking occasion than do Whites, resulting in a higher cumulative dose of
alcohol (9). In addition, Hispanics have a higher prevalence than do Whites of hepatitis C, a serious infectious
liver disease that greatly increases the risk for liver damage in heavy drinkers (10).
Social Consequences. According to data from a nationwide survey, the prevalences of drinking and driving
in the past year were 19 percent among AI/ANs, 11 percent for both Whites and Hispanics, 7 percent for African
Americans and less than 6 percent for AAPIs (4). Alcohol-related fatal crashes are 3 times more prevalent
among AI/ANs than among the general population (3), constituting 1 of the 10 leading causes of death among
AI/ANs, along with alcohol-related suicide, homicide and cirrhosis (11).
Contributors to Ethnic Differences
Social Factors. The availability of alcohol, as measured in terms of the geographic density of alcohol sales
outlets, has been linked to patterns of alcohol-related traffic crashes in communities (12). Studies have shown
that greater densities of liquor stores are found in segregated minority neighborhoods (13). However, the
apparent association between minority status and alcohol problems in some areas may reflect the
disproportionate concentration of alcohol outlets in low-income communities (12) rather than ethnicity per se.
Another factor contributing to minority drinking patterns is acculturation, the partial or complete adoption of the
beliefs and values of the prevailing social system. Through acculturation, the original drinking pattern of an
ethnic group tends to change to resemble more closely that of the overall population. However, acculturation
also is influenced by gender, religious beliefs, family traditions, personal expectations and country of origin
(14). Some researchers have advanced the concept of "acculturation stress," whereby drinking increases in
response to the conflict between traditional values and beliefs and those of the mainstream culture. Conversely,
others have pointed out that many people, especially youth, learn to draw on support and resources from both
cultures for protection against alcohol problems (5).
Biological Factors. People vary in their vulnerability to the effects of
alcohol. Some of these differences result from genetically determined
variations in the body's ability to break down (i.e., metabolize) and
eliminate alcohol (15). For example, after drinking, many Asian
subpopulations experience flushing of the skin, nausea, headache
and other uncomfortable symptoms. Those symptoms result primarily
from inactivity of aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2), an enzyme
involved in a key step of alcohol metabolism (16). A study of Asian
males born in Canada and the United States found that those who
had inherited the gene for the less active form of this enzyme drank
two-thirds less alcohol, had one-third the rate of binge drinking (i.e.,
consumption of more than 5 drinks per day), and were three times more likely to be abstainers than a group of
Asian males who possessed the more active enzyme (17). However, some people develop alcohol problems
despite possessing the inactive form of ALDH2, demonstrating the importance of additional factors in the
development of drinking patterns and consequences (17).
Among some African Americans, genetically determined variability in another alcohol-metabolizing enzyme,
alcohol dehydrogenase-2, appears to affect the degree of vulnerability to alcoholic cirrhosis and alcohol-related
fetal damage (15).
Prevention
Some alcohol prevention programs that have demonstrated success in the general population have been
modified to be more culturally relevant for specific ethnic groups. The following two programs have been
scientifically evaluated to compare the effectiveness of the culturally sensitive version with that of the
generalized version for the populations in question.
School-Based Prevention. The school-based Life Skills Training (LST) program was designed to help
adolescents cope with social influences that encourage use of alcohol and other drugs (AODs). Researchers
compared the standard LST program with a modified version based on both the traditional and current cultural
heritages of African American and Hispanic inner-city youth (1). Data collected two years after program initiation
indicated that participation in either program produced significant decreases in measures of alcohol
consumption. However, the culturally focused approach produced significantly greater improvement than did the
generalized LST approach (1).
Family-Based Prevention. Since its inception as a generic program for White and multiethnic children of
alcohol- or other drug-abusing parents, the Strengthening Families Program (SFP) has been modified for use
with specific ethnic populations. The modified program generally has been found effective in reducing family
problems and alcohol use among rural and urban African Americans and to a lesser extent with urban Hispanics
(2). Among Native Hawaiians, however, comparison of the generic SFP with a culturally modified format
produced inconclusive results (2).
Alcohol Availability. The high density of alcohol outlets in minority neighborhoods is noted above. However,
the effect of limiting alcohol availability to reduce drinking problems among specific minority groups is not known.
An exception to this situation is found among Alaska Natives, where geographic isolation and diversity of local
alcohol control policies have combined to enable controlled research on naturally occurring experiments.
Studies of local alcohol control laws in remote Alaska Native communities have shown that prohibiting the sale,
importation and possession of alcohol by adults as well as by adolescents (i.e., dry communities), is associated
with total (18) and alcohol-involved (19) injury-related death rates and alcohol-related outpatient visits (20). In
contrast, a study of American Indian reservations in the northwestern United States suggests that
alcohol-related deaths may be reduced more effectively by restricting the sale and use of alcoholic beverages,
rather than by prohibiting them (19). This conclusion is supported by results of a study that mapped the
locations of alcohol-related deaths in a "dry" Navajo reservation in New Mexico. Most such deaths occurred
among intoxicated pedestrians along roads leading to border towns, suggesting that those residents were
returning from places outside the reservation where they had gone to obtain alcohol (21).
Treatment

The Community Reinforcement Approach is a highly flexible
treatment intervention that can be adapted to ethnic or cultural
minorities through cooperation with family and community networks.
The program has experienced some initial success in treating
alcoholic members of a Navajo subpopulation in New Mexico who had
not responded to previous alcoholism treatment approaches. An
integral part of the program was the inclusion of American Indian
spiritual traditions to encourage abstinence (22). However, no
randomized, controlled studies have been performed to prove that
incorporating traditional cultural and spiritual beliefs and practices
would enhance treatment in other AI/AN cultures (3). In particular, the
growing urban AI/AN population tends to be highly acculturated with little or no knowledge of reservation or
native village cultural traditions (23).
Alcohol and Minorities - A Commentary by NIAAA Director Enoch Gordis, M.D.
In the previous
Alert on this topic, I noted that the increasing number of studies of alcohol problems among
minorities had produced important findings and important new questions to answer. This continues to be the
case. For example, we know that Hispanic males have the highest rates of cirrhosis mortality among all groups,
but we do not know why. We have begun to identify biological mechanisms that may increase vulnerability to
alcohol-related fetal damage in some African Americans. More complete knowledge of these mechanisms brings
new hope for pharmacotherapy to aid the already indispensable prevention methods in reducing risk. Finally,
although we have begun to look at the effects of society and culture on alcohol problems among U.S. minority
groups, the heterogeneity of such groups presents a future research challenge and opportunity.
A Personal Note
As many readers know, I retired as Director of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) as
of December 31, 2001. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the scientists and NIAAA staff who have
worked on putting together the
Alcohol Alert since its inception in 1988, and the many counselors, policymakers
and interested members of the public who read and use the information in the
Alerts.
As a personal observation, the alcohol field has changed tremendously since I entered it in the 1960s. My
predecessors as NIAAA Director and I have been gratified to see the field's growth over the years into the
well-respected, science-based field of medicine that it is today. We have made much progress, but as long as
alcohol remains the number one drug of abuse in our nation with such heavy personal, social and economic
costs, we have much to do. I believe we are up to the challenge, and I wish each and every one of you success
in the coming years.
References
(1) Botvin, G.J.; Schinke, S.P.; Epstein, J.A.; Diaz, T.; and Botvin, E.M. Effectiveness of culturally focused and
generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Two-year
follow-up results. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 9(3):183194, 1995.
(2) Kumpfer, K.L. Selective
prevention interventions: The Strengthening Families Program. In: Ashery, R.S.; Robertson, E.B.; and Kumpfer,
K.L., eds., Drug Abuse Prevention Through Family Interventions: NIDA Research Monograph No. 177. NIH Pub.
No. 99 4135 Rockville, MD National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1998. pp. 160 207.
(3) Beauvais, F. American
Indians and alcohol. Alcohol Health & Research World 22(4):253 259, 1998.
(4) Stinson, F.S.; Yi, H.; Grant,
B.F.; Chou, P.; Dawson, D.A.; and Pickering, R. Drinking in the United States: Main findings from the 1992
National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey (NLAES). NIH Pub. No. 99 3519. Bethesda, MD: National
Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1998.
(5) Kim, S.; Coletti, S.D.; Williams, S.C.; and Hepler, N.A.
Substance abuse prevention involving Asian/Pacific Islander American communities. In: Botvin, G.J.; Schinke,
S.; and Orlandi, M.A., eds. Drug Abuse Prevention in Multiethnic Youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications,
1995. Pp. 295 326.
(6) Makimoto, K. Drinking patterns and drinking problems among Asian-Americans and
Pacific Islanders. Alcohol Health & Research World 22(4):270 275, 1998.
(7) Johnston, L.D.; O'Malley, P.M.;
and Bachman, J.G. Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975 2000. Volume I:
Secondary School Students. NIH Pub. No. 01 4924. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2001.
(8) Singh, G.K., and Hoyert, D.L. Social epidemiology of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis mortality in the
United States, 1935 1997: Trends and differentials by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and alcohol consumption.
Human Biology 72(5):801 820, 2000.
(9) Stinson, F.S.; Grant, B.F.; and Dufour, M.C. The critical dimension of
ethnicity in liver cirrhosis mortality statistics. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 25(8):1181 1187,
2001.
(10) Lieber, C.S. Liver disease by alcohol and hepatitis C: Early detection and new insights in
pathogenesis lead to improved treatment. American Journal on Addictions 10(Suppl.):29 50, 2001.
(11) Grossman, D.C.; Sugarman, J.R.; Fox, C.; and Moran, J. Motor-vehicle crash-injury factors among
American Indians. Accident Analysis and Prevention 29(3):313 319, 1997.
(12) Gruenewald, P.J.; Millar, A.;
Ponicki, W.R.; and Brinkley, G. Physical and economic access to alcohol. In: Wilson, R.A., and Dufour, M.C., eds.
The Epidemiology of Alcohol Problems in Small Geographic Areas. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism Research Monograph 36. NIH Pub. No. 00-4357. Bethesda, MD: the Institute, 2000. Pp. 163 212.
(13) Treno, A.J.; Alaniz, M.L.; and Gruenewald, P.J. The use of drinking places by gender, age and ethnic
groups: An analysis of routine drinking activities. Addiction 95(4):537 551, 2000.
(14) Johnson, F.W.;
Gruenewald, P.J.; Treno, A.J.; and Taff, G.A. Drinking over the life course within gender and ethnic groups: A
hyperparametric analysis. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 59(5):568 580, 1998.
(15) Yin, S.J., and Agarwal, D.P.
Functional polymorphism of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases: Alcohol metabolism, alcoholism, and
alcohol-induced organ damage. In: Agarwal, D.P., and Seitz, H.K., eds. Alcohol in Health and Disease. New York,
NY: Marcel Dekker, 2001. Pp. 1 26.
(16) Agarwal, D.P.; Harada, S.; and Goedde, H.W. Racial differences in
biological sensitivity to ethanol: The role of alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase isozymes.
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 5(1):12 16, 1981.
(17) Tu, G.C., And Israel, Y. Alcohol
consumption by Orientals in North America is predicted largely by a single gene. Behavior Genetics 25(1):59 65,
1995.
(18) Berman, M.; Hull, T.; and May, P. Alcohol control and injury death in Alaska Native Communities:
Wet, damp and dry under Alaska's local option law. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 61(2):311 319, 2000.
(19) Landen, M.G.; Beller, M.; Funk, E.; Propst, M.; Middaugh, J.; and Moolenaar, R.L. Alcohol-related injury
death and alcohol availability in remote Alaska. Journal of the American Medical Association 278(21):1755 1758,
1997.
(20) Chiu, A.Y.; Perez, P.E.; and Parker, R.N. Impact of banning alcohol on outpatient visits in Barrow,
Alaska. Journal of the American Medical Association 278(21):1775 1777, 1997.
(21) Landen, M.G.
Alcohol-related mortality and tribal alcohol legislation. Journal of Rural Health 13(1):38 44, 1997.
(22) Miller,
W.R.; Meyers, R.J.; And Hiller-Sturmhöfel, S. The Community-Reinforcement Approach. Alcohol Research &
Health 23(2):116 121, 1999.
(23) LaFramboise, T.D.; Trimble, J.E.; And Mohatt, G.V. Counseling intervention
and American Indian tradition: An integrative approach. In: Hornby, R., ed. Alcohol and Native Americans;
Mission, SD: Sinte Gleska Univ. Press. 1995. Pp. 149 169.